Informational requirements of social choice rules to avoid the Condorcet loser
نویسنده
چکیده
I consider informational requirements of social choice rules satisfying anonymity, neutrality, monotonicity, and efficiency, and never choosing the Condorcet loser. Depending on the number of agents and the number of alternatives, either the plurality rule or a plurality with a runoff is characterized. In some cases, the plurality rule is the most selective rule among the rules operating on the minimal informational requirement. In the other cases, each rule operating on the minimal informational requirement is a two-stage rule, and among them, a plurality with a runoff is the rule whose choice at the first stage is most selective. These results not only clarify properties of the plurality rule and a plurality with a runoff, but also explain why they are widely used in real societies.
منابع مشابه
Informational requirements of social choice rules to avoid the Condorcet loser: A characterization of the plurality with a runoff
I consider informational requirements of social choice rules satisfying anonymity, neutrality, monotonicity, and efficiency, and never choosing the Condorcet loser. Depending on the number of agents and the number of alternatives, either the plurality rule or a plurality with a runoff is characterized. In some cases, the plurality rule is the most selective rule among the rules operating on the...
متن کاملA note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser
Analytical representations are developed for the probability that Approval Voting (AV) elects the Condorcet Loser in three-alternative elections with large electorates. A comparison of AV is then made to Plurality Rule (PR) to show that AV is much less susceptible to the risk of electing the Condorcet loser than PR. All calculations in this analysis are based on IAC-like assumptions.
متن کاملInformational requirements of social choice rules
The needed amount of information to make a social choice is the cost of information processing, and it is a practically important feature of social choice rules. We introduce informational aspects into the analysis of social choice rules and prove that (i) if an anonymous, neutral, and monotonic social choice rule operates on minimal informational requirements, then it is a supercorrespondence ...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Practical Relevance of Voting Paradoxes via Ehrhart Theory, Computer Simulations, and Empirical Data
Results from social choice theory are increasingly used to argue about collective decision making in computational multiagent systems. A large part of the social choice literature studies voting paradoxes in which seemingly mild properties are violated by common voting rules. In this paper, we investigate the likelihood of the Condorcet Loser Paradox (CLP) and the Agenda Contraction Paradox (AC...
متن کاملChoosing Combinatorial Social Choice by Heuristic Search
This paper studies the problem of computing aggregation rules in combinatorial domains, where the set of possible alternatives is a Cartesian product of (finite) domain values for each of a given set of variables, and these variables are usually not preferentially independent. We propose a very general heuristic framework SC* for computing different aggregation rules, including rules for cardin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012